.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 .. Copyright © 2017-2020 Mickaël Salaün .. Copyright © 2019-2020 ANSSI .. Copyright © 2021-2022 Microsoft Corporation ===================================== Landlock: unprivileged access control ===================================== :Author: Mickaël Salaün :Date: October 2024 The goal of Landlock is to enable restriction of ambient rights (e.g. global filesystem or network access) for a set of processes. Because Landlock is a stackable LSM, it makes it possible to create safe security sandboxes as new security layers in addition to the existing system-wide access-controls. This kind of sandbox is expected to help mitigate the security impact of bugs or unexpected/malicious behaviors in user space applications. Landlock empowers any process, including unprivileged ones, to securely restrict themselves. We can quickly make sure that Landlock is enabled in the running system by looking for "landlock: Up and running" in kernel logs (as root): ``dmesg | grep landlock || journalctl -kb -g landlock`` . Developers can also easily check for Landlock support with a :ref:`related system call `. If Landlock is not currently supported, we need to :ref:`configure the kernel appropriately `. Landlock rules ============== A Landlock rule describes an action on an object which the process intends to perform. A set of rules is aggregated in a ruleset, which can then restrict the thread enforcing it, and its future children. The two existing types of rules are: Filesystem rules For these rules, the object is a file hierarchy, and the related filesystem actions are defined with `filesystem access rights`. Network rules (since ABI v4) For these rules, the object is a TCP port, and the related actions are defined with `network access rights`. Defining and enforcing a security policy ---------------------------------------- We first need to define the ruleset that will contain our rules. For this example, the ruleset will contain rules that only allow filesystem read actions and establish a specific TCP connection. Filesystem write actions and other TCP actions will be denied. The ruleset then needs to handle both these kinds of actions. This is required for backward and forward compatibility (i.e. the kernel and user space may not know each other's supported restrictions), hence the need to be explicit about the denied-by-default access rights. .. code-block:: c struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { .handled_access_fs = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_DIR | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_FILE | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_CHAR | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_DIR | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_REG | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SOCK | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_FIFO | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_BLOCK | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV, .handled_access_net = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP, .scoped = LANDLOCK_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET | LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, }; Because we may not know which kernel version an application will be executed on, it is safer to follow a best-effort security approach. Indeed, we should try to protect users as much as possible whatever the kernel they are using. To be compatible with older Linux versions, we detect the available Landlock ABI version, and only use the available subset of access rights: .. code-block:: c int abi; abi = landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0, LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_VERSION); if (abi < 0) { /* Degrades gracefully if Landlock is not handled. */ perror("The running kernel does not enable to use Landlock"); return 0; } switch (abi) { case 1: /* Removes LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER for ABI < 2 */ ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs &= ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER; __attribute__((fallthrough)); case 2: /* Removes LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE for ABI < 3 */ ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs &= ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE; __attribute__((fallthrough)); case 3: /* Removes network support for ABI < 4 */ ruleset_attr.handled_access_net &= ~(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP); __attribute__((fallthrough)); case 4: /* Removes LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV for ABI < 5 */ ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs &= ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV; __attribute__((fallthrough)); case 5: /* Removes LANDLOCK_SCOPE_* for ABI < 6 */ ruleset_attr.scoped &= ~(LANDLOCK_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET | LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL); } This enables the creation of an inclusive ruleset that will contain our rules. .. code-block:: c int ruleset_fd; ruleset_fd = landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); if (ruleset_fd < 0) { perror("Failed to create a ruleset"); return 1; } We can now add a new rule to this ruleset thanks to the returned file descriptor referring to this ruleset. The rule will only allow reading the file hierarchy ``/usr``. Without another rule, write actions would then be denied by the ruleset. To add ``/usr`` to the ruleset, we open it with the ``O_PATH`` flag and fill the &struct landlock_path_beneath_attr with this file descriptor. .. code-block:: c int err; struct landlock_path_beneath_attr path_beneath = { .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR, }; path_beneath.parent_fd = open("/usr", O_PATH | O_CLOEXEC); if (path_beneath.parent_fd < 0) { perror("Failed to open file"); close(ruleset_fd); return 1; } err = landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH, &path_beneath, 0); close(path_beneath.parent_fd); if (err) { perror("Failed to update ruleset"); close(ruleset_fd); return 1; } It may also be required to create rules following the same logic as explained for the ruleset creation, by filtering access rights according to the Landlock ABI version. In this example, this is not required because all of the requested ``allowed_access`` rights are already available in ABI 1. For network access-control, we can add a set of rules that allow to use a port number for a specific action: HTTPS connections. .. code-block:: c struct landlock_net_port_attr net_port = { .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP, .port = 443, }; err = landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT, &net_port, 0); The next step is to restrict the current thread from gaining more privileges (e.g. through a SUID binary). We now have a ruleset with the first rule allowing read access to ``/usr`` while denying all other handled accesses for the filesystem, and a second rule allowing HTTPS connections. .. code-block:: c if (prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0)) { perror("Failed to restrict privileges"); close(ruleset_fd); return 1; } The current thread is now ready to sandbox itself with the ruleset. .. code-block:: c if (landlock_restrict_self(ruleset_fd, 0)) { perror("Failed to enforce ruleset"); close(ruleset_fd); return 1; } close(ruleset_fd); If the ``landlock_restrict_self`` system call succeeds, the current thread is now restricted and this policy will be enforced on all its subsequently created children as well. Once a thread is landlocked, there is no way to remove its security policy; only adding more restrictions is allowed. These threads are now in a new Landlock domain, which is a merger of their parent one (if any) with the new ruleset. Full working code can be found in `samples/landlock/sandboxer.c`_. Good practices -------------- It is recommended to set access rights to file hierarchy leaves as much as possible. For instance, it is better to be able to have ``~/doc/`` as a read-only hierarchy and ``~/tmp/`` as a read-write hierarchy, compared to ``~/`` as a read-only hierarchy and ``~/tmp/`` as a read-write hierarchy. Following this good practice leads to self-sufficient hierarchies that do not depend on their location (i.e. parent directories). This is particularly relevant when we want to allow linking or renaming. Indeed, having consistent access rights per directory enables changing the location of such directories without relying on the destination directory access rights (except those that are required for this operation, see ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER`` documentation). Having self-sufficient hierarchies also helps to tighten the required access rights to the minimal set of data. This also helps avoid sinkhole directories, i.e. directories where data can be linked to but not linked from. However, this depends on data organization, which might not be controlled by developers. In this case, granting read-write access to ``~/tmp/``, instead of write-only access, would potentially allow moving ``~/tmp/`` to a non-readable directory and still keep the ability to list the content of ``~/tmp/``. Layers of file path access rights --------------------------------- Each time a thread enforces a ruleset on itself, it updates its Landlock domain with a new layer of policy. This complementary policy is stacked with any other rulesets potentially already restricting this thread. A sandboxed thread can then safely add more constraints to itself with a new enforced ruleset. One policy layer grants access to a file path if at least one of its rules encountered on the path grants the access. A sandboxed thread can only access a file path if all its enforced policy layers grant the access as well as all the other system access controls (e.g. filesystem DAC, other LSM policies, etc.). Bind mounts and OverlayFS ------------------------- Landlock enables restricting access to file hierarchies, which means that these access rights can be propagated with bind mounts (cf. Documentation/filesystems/sharedsubtree.rst) but not with Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst. A bind mount mirrors a source file hierarchy to a destination. The destination hierarchy is then composed of the exact same files, on which Landlock rules can be tied, either via the source or the destination path. These rules restrict access when they are encountered on a path, which means that they can restrict access to multiple file hierarchies at the same time, whether these hierarchies are the result of bind mounts or not. An OverlayFS mount point consists of upper and lower layers. These layers are combined in a merge directory, and that merged directory becomes available at the mount point. This merge hierarchy may include files from the upper and lower layers, but modifications performed on the merge hierarchy only reflect on the upper layer. From a Landlock policy point of view, all OverlayFS layers and merge hierarchies are standalone and each contains their own set of files and directories, which is different from bind mounts. A policy restricting an OverlayFS layer will not restrict the resulted merged hierarchy, and vice versa. Landlock users should then only think about file hierarchies they want to allow access to, regardless of the underlying filesystem. Inheritance ----------- Every new thread resulting from a :manpage:`clone(2)` inherits Landlock domain restrictions from its parent. This is similar to seccomp inheritance (cf. Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst) or any other LSM dealing with task's :manpage:`credentials(7)`. For instance, one process's thread may apply Landlock rules to itself, but they will not be automatically applied to other sibling threads (unlike POSIX thread credential changes, cf. :manpage:`nptl(7)`). When a thread sandboxes itself, we have the guarantee that the related security policy will stay enforced on all this thread's descendants. This allows creating standalone and modular security policies per application, which will automatically be composed between themselves according to their runtime parent policies. Ptrace restrictions ------------------- A sandboxed process has less privileges than a non-sandboxed process and must then be subject to additional restrictions when manipulating another process. To be allowed to use :manpage:`ptrace(2)` and related syscalls on a target process, a sandboxed process should have a superset of the target process's access rights, which means the tracee must be in a sub-domain of the tracer. IPC scoping ----------- Similar to the implicit `Ptrace restrictions`_, we may want to further restrict interactions between sandboxes. Each Landlock domain can be explicitly scoped for a set of actions by specifying it on a ruleset. For example, if a sandboxed process should not be able to :manpage:`connect(2)` to a non-sandboxed process through abstract :manpage:`unix(7)` sockets, we can specify such a restriction with ``LANDLOCK_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET``. Moreover, if a sandboxed process should not be able to send a signal to a non-sandboxed process, we can specify this restriction with ``LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL``. A sandboxed process can connect to a non-sandboxed process when its domain is not scoped. If a process's domain is scoped, it can only connect to sockets created by processes in the same scope. Moreover, If a process is scoped to send signal to a non-scoped process, it can only send signals to processes in the same scope. A connected datagram socket behaves like a stream socket when its domain is scoped, meaning if the domain is scoped after the socket is connected , it can still :manpage:`send(2)` data just like a stream socket. However, in the same scenario, a non-connected datagram socket cannot send data (with :manpage:`sendto(2)`) outside its scope. A process with a scoped domain can inherit a socket created by a non-scoped process. The process cannot connect to this socket since it has a scoped domain. IPC scoping does not support exceptions, so if a domain is scoped, no rules can be added to allow access to resources or processes outside of the scope. Truncating files ---------------- The operations covered by ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE`` and ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE`` both change the contents of a file and sometimes overlap in non-intuitive ways. It is recommended to always specify both of these together. A particularly surprising example is :manpage:`creat(2)`. The name suggests that this system call requires the rights to create and write files. However, it also requires the truncate right if an existing file under the same name is already present. It should also be noted that truncating files does not require the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE`` right. Apart from the :manpage:`truncate(2)` system call, this can also be done through :manpage:`open(2)` with the flags ``O_RDONLY | O_TRUNC``. The truncate right is associated with the opened file (see below). Rights associated with file descriptors --------------------------------------- When opening a file, the availability of the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE`` and ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV`` rights is associated with the newly created file descriptor and will be used for subsequent truncation and ioctl attempts using :manpage:`ftruncate(2)` and :manpage:`ioctl(2)`. The behavior is similar to opening a file for reading or writing, where permissions are checked during :manpage:`open(2)`, but not during the subsequent :manpage:`read(2)` and :manpage:`write(2)` calls. As a consequence, it is possible that a process has multiple open file descriptors referring to the same file, but Landlock enforces different things when operating with these file descriptors. This can happen when a Landlock ruleset gets enforced and the process keeps file descriptors which were opened both before and after the enforcement. It is also possible to pass such file descriptors between processes, keeping their Landlock properties, even when some of the involved processes do not have an enforced Landlock ruleset. Compatibility ============= Backward and forward compatibility ---------------------------------- Landlock is designed to be compatible with past and future versions of the kernel. This is achieved thanks to the system call attributes and the associated bitflags, particularly the ruleset's ``handled_access_fs``. Making handled access rights explicit enables the kernel and user space to have a clear contract with each other. This is required to make sure sandboxing will not get stricter with a system update, which could break applications. Developers can subscribe to the `Landlock mailing list `_ to knowingly update and test their applications with the latest available features. In the interest of users, and because they may use different kernel versions, it is strongly encouraged to follow a best-effort security approach by checking the Landlock ABI version at runtime and only enforcing the supported features. .. _landlock_abi_versions: Landlock ABI versions --------------------- The Landlock ABI version can be read with the sys_landlock_create_ruleset() system call: .. code-block:: c int abi; abi = landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0, LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_VERSION); if (abi < 0) { switch (errno) { case ENOSYS: printf("Landlock is not supported by the current kernel.\n"); break; case EOPNOTSUPP: printf("Landlock is currently disabled.\n"); break; } return 0; } if (abi >= 2) { printf("Landlock supports LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER.\n"); } The following kernel interfaces are implicitly supported by the first ABI version. Features only supported from a specific version are explicitly marked as such. Kernel interface ================ Access rights ------------- .. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/linux/landlock.h :identifiers: fs_access net_access scope Creating a new ruleset ---------------------- .. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/syscalls.c :identifiers: sys_landlock_create_ruleset .. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/linux/landlock.h :identifiers: landlock_ruleset_attr Extending a ruleset ------------------- .. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/syscalls.c :identifiers: sys_landlock_add_rule .. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/linux/landlock.h :identifiers: landlock_rule_type landlock_path_beneath_attr landlock_net_port_attr Enforcing a ruleset ------------------- .. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/syscalls.c :identifiers: sys_landlock_restrict_self Current limitations =================== Filesystem topology modification -------------------------------- Threads sandboxed with filesystem restrictions cannot modify filesystem topology, whether via :manpage:`mount(2)` or :manpage:`pivot_root(2)`. However, :manpage:`chroot(2)` calls are not denied. Special filesystems ------------------- Access to regular files and directories can be restricted by Landlock, according to the handled accesses of a ruleset. However, files that do not come from a user-visible filesystem (e.g. pipe, socket), but can still be accessed through ``/proc//fd/*``, cannot currently be explicitly restricted. Likewise, some special kernel filesystems such as nsfs, which can be accessed through ``/proc//ns/*``, cannot currently be explicitly restricted. However, thanks to the `ptrace restrictions`_, access to such sensitive ``/proc`` files are automatically restricted according to domain hierarchies. Future Landlock evolutions could still enable to explicitly restrict such paths with dedicated ruleset flags. Ruleset layers -------------- There is a limit of 16 layers of stacked rulesets. This can be an issue for a task willing to enforce a new ruleset in complement to its 16 inherited rulesets. Once this limit is reached, sys_landlock_restrict_self() returns E2BIG. It is then strongly suggested to carefully build rulesets once in the life of a thread, especially for applications able to launch other applications that may also want to sandbox themselves (e.g. shells, container managers, etc.). Memory usage ------------ Kernel memory allocated to create rulesets is accounted and can be restricted by the Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst. IOCTL support ------------- The ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV`` right restricts the use of :manpage:`ioctl(2)`, but it only applies to *newly opened* device files. This means specifically that pre-existing file descriptors like stdin, stdout and stderr are unaffected. Users should be aware that TTY devices have traditionally permitted to control other processes on the same TTY through the ``TIOCSTI`` and ``TIOCLINUX`` IOCTL commands. Both of these require ``CAP_SYS_ADMIN`` on modern Linux systems, but the behavior is configurable for ``TIOCSTI``. On older systems, it is therefore recommended to close inherited TTY file descriptors, or to reopen them from ``/proc/self/fd/*`` without the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV`` right, if possible. Landlock's IOCTL support is coarse-grained at the moment, but may become more fine-grained in the future. Until then, users are advised to establish the guarantees that they need through the file hierarchy, by only allowing the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV`` right on files where it is really required. Previous limitations ==================== File renaming and linking (ABI < 2) ----------------------------------- Because Landlock targets unprivileged access controls, it needs to properly handle composition of rules. Such property also implies rules nesting. Properly handling multiple layers of rulesets, each one of them able to restrict access to files, also implies inheritance of the ruleset restrictions from a parent to its hierarchy. Because files are identified and restricted by their hierarchy, moving or linking a file from one directory to another implies propagation of the hierarchy constraints, or restriction of these actions according to the potentially lost constraints. To protect against privilege escalations through renaming or linking, and for the sake of simplicity, Landlock previously limited linking and renaming to the same directory. Starting with the Landlock ABI version 2, it is now possible to securely control renaming and linking thanks to the new ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER`` access right. File truncation (ABI < 3) ------------------------- File truncation could not be denied before the third Landlock ABI, so it is always allowed when using a kernel that only supports the first or second ABI. Starting with the Landlock ABI version 3, it is now possible to securely control truncation thanks to the new ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE`` access right. TCP bind and connect (ABI < 4) ------------------------------ Starting with the Landlock ABI version 4, it is now possible to restrict TCP bind and connect actions to only a set of allowed ports thanks to the new ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP`` and ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP`` access rights. Device IOCTL (ABI < 5) ---------------------- IOCTL operations could not be denied before the fifth Landlock ABI, so :manpage:`ioctl(2)` is always allowed when using a kernel that only supports an earlier ABI. Starting with the Landlock ABI version 5, it is possible to restrict the use of :manpage:`ioctl(2)` on character and block devices using the new ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV`` right. Abstract UNIX socket (ABI < 6) ------------------------------ Starting with the Landlock ABI version 6, it is possible to restrict connections to an abstract :manpage:`unix(7)` socket by setting ``LANDLOCK_SCOPE_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET`` to the ``scoped`` ruleset attribute. Signal (ABI < 6) ---------------- Starting with the Landlock ABI version 6, it is possible to restrict :manpage:`signal(7)` sending by setting ``LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL`` to the ``scoped`` ruleset attribute. .. _kernel_support: Kernel support ============== Build time configuration ------------------------ Landlock was first introduced in Linux 5.13 but it must be configured at build time with ``CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK=y``. Landlock must also be enabled at boot time like other security modules. The list of security modules enabled by default is set with ``CONFIG_LSM``. The kernel configuration should then contain ``CONFIG_LSM=landlock,[...]`` with ``[...]`` as the list of other potentially useful security modules for the running system (see the ``CONFIG_LSM`` help). Boot time configuration ----------------------- If the running kernel does not have ``landlock`` in ``CONFIG_LSM``, then we can enable Landlock by adding ``lsm=landlock,[...]`` to Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst in the boot loader configuration. For example, if the current built-in configuration is: .. code-block:: console $ zgrep -h "^CONFIG_LSM=" "/boot/config-$(uname -r)" /proc/config.gz 2>/dev/null CONFIG_LSM="lockdown,yama,integrity,apparmor" ...and if the cmdline doesn't contain ``landlock`` either: .. code-block:: console $ sed -n 's/.*\(\`_). What about namespaces and containers? ------------------------------------- Namespaces can help create sandboxes but they are not designed for access-control and then miss useful features for such use case (e.g. no fine-grained restrictions). Moreover, their complexity can lead to security issues, especially when untrusted processes can manipulate them (cf. `Controlling access to user namespaces `_). Additional documentation ======================== * Documentation/security/landlock.rst * https://landlock.io .. Links .. _samples/landlock/sandboxer.c: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/samples/landlock/sandboxer.c