# If both a static and a dynamic TCH/H (even without pchan switch!) are available, we always prefer static TS.
create-bts trx-count 1 timeslots c+s4  dyn    TCH/H  dyn    TCH/H  dyn    TCH/H  PDCH

network
 bts 0
  channel allocator mode set-all ascending

set-ts-use    trx 0 0     states *     TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H *

# the dynamic timeslot is already in TCH/H mode, and needs no pchan switch. It appears first in the list, hence it would
# be used first -- but we prefer using static TS when still available:
create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR
expect-ts-use trx 0 0     states *     TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H *
#                                                 ^

# Interference ratings do NOT influence whether a static or dynamic lchan (even without pchan switch) is going to be
# assigned.
network
 bts 0
  channel allocator avoid-interference 1
  interference-meas level-bounds -115 -109 -103 -97 -91 -85
#                                  0    1    2   3   4   5

# Here the dyn TS lchan happens to have less interference. But still the choice to prefer static over dynamic weighs
# stronger. The static TS with least interference is picked.
#                                      dyn    TCH/H  dyn    TCH/H  dyn    TCH/H
expect-ts-use trx 0 0     states *     TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H *
res-ind trx 0 0 levels           -         4-     --     1-     4-     3-     2- -
create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR
expect-ts-use trx 0 0     states *     TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/-H TCH/HH *
#                                                                             ^
create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR
expect-ts-use trx 0 0     states *     TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/HH *
#                                                               ^
# now only dynamic TS are left. The one dyn lchan with least interference is picked
create-ms bts 0 TCH/H AMR
expect-ts-use trx 0 0     states *     TCH/-H TCH/HH TCH/HH TCH/HH TCH/-H TCH/HH *
#                                                        ^