
----------------------------------------------
trial-2350 nitb_smpp esme_ms_sms_storeforward.py
----------------------------------------------
22:58:17.925759 tst                        nitb_smpp: Using 1 x ip_address (candidates: 1)
22:58:17.936649 tst                        nitb_smpp: Using 1 x bts (candidates: 1)
22:58:18.059390 tst      esme_ms_sms_storeforward.py: using LAC 17334
22:58:18.186037 tst      esme_ms_sms_storeforward.py: using RAC 249
22:58:18.308163 tst      esme_ms_sms_storeforward.py: using CellId 17334
22:58:18.428822 tst      esme_ms_sms_storeforward.py: using BVCI 17335
22:58:18.452156 tst                        nitb_smpp: Using 1 x modem (candidates: 1)
22:58:18.672916 tst      esme_ms_sms_storeforward.py: using MSISDN 6893
22:58:18.874466 tst   esme_ms_sms_storeforward.py:20: start nitb and bts...
22:58:19.012045 run             osmo-nitb_10.42.42.2: Starting osmo-nitb
22:58:19.688448 run pcap-recorder_any(filters='host 10.42.42.2 and port not 22')(pid=25024): Launched
22:58:20.014412 run  osmo-nitb_10.42.42.2(pid=25025): Launched
22:58:20.202566 run  osmo-nitb_10.42.42.2(pid=25025): ERR: Terminated: ERROR {rc=2}  [trial-2350↪nitb_smpp↪esme_ms_sms_storeforward.py:23↪esme_ms_sms_storeforward.py↪osmo-nitb_10.42.42.2↪osmo-nitb_10.42.42.2(pid=25025)]
22:58:20.339171 run  osmo-nitb_10.42.42.2(pid=25025): stdout: 
| (launched: 2022-12-08_22:58:19.856822) 
22:58:20.476271 run  osmo-nitb_10.42.42.2(pid=25025): stderr: 
| (launched: 2022-12-08_22:58:19.906013)
| ======================================================================
| ERROR: You should not run osmo-nitb. It is ancient, unmaintained and
| obsolete for several years.  If you really want to ignore years of hard work on
| the new post-NITB stack (osmo-bsc, osmo-mgw, osmo-msc, osmo-hlr, osmo-stp),
| you may ues the '--yes-i-really-want-to-run-prehistoric-software' command line
| argument.  DON'T EVER BOTHER THE DEVELOPERS IF YOU ENCOUNTER PROBLEMS WITH IT!!!
| Use https://osmocom.org/projects/cellular-infrastructure/wiki/Osmocom_Network_In_The_Box
| ====================================================================== 
22:58:20.608444 run  osmo-nitb_10.42.42.2(pid=25025): stdout: 
| (launched: 2022-12-08_22:58:19.856822) 
22:58:20.739383 run  osmo-nitb_10.42.42.2(pid=25025): stderr: 
| (launched: 2022-12-08_22:58:19.906013)
| ======================================================================
| ERROR: You should not run osmo-nitb. It is ancient, unmaintained and
| obsolete for several years.  If you really want to ignore years of hard work on
| the new post-NITB stack (osmo-bsc, osmo-mgw, osmo-msc, osmo-hlr, osmo-stp),
| you may ues the '--yes-i-really-want-to-run-prehistoric-software' command line
| argument.  DON'T EVER BOTHER THE DEVELOPERS IF YOU ENCOUNTER PROBLEMS WITH IT!!!
| Use https://osmocom.org/projects/cellular-infrastructure/wiki/Osmocom_Network_In_The_Box
| ====================================================================== 
22:58:20.796415 tst   esme_ms_sms_storeforward.py:23: ERR: Error: osmo-nitb_10.42.42.2(pid=25025): Process ended prematurely: osmo-nitb_10.42.42.2(pid=25025) [trial-2350↪nitb_smpp↪esme_ms_sms_storeforward.py:23↪esme_ms_sms_storeforward.py↪osmo-nitb_10.42.42.2↪osmo-nitb_10.42.42.2(pid=25025)]  [trial-2350↪nitb_smpp↪esme_ms_sms_storeforward.py:23]
22:58:20.805102 tst   esme_ms_sms_storeforward.py:23: Test FAILED (2.9 sec)
22:58:20.841487 run pcap-recorder_any(filters='host 10.42.42.2 and port not 22')(pid=25024): Terminating (SIGTERM)
22:58:21.019217 ---      ParallelTerminationStrategy: PID 25024 died...
22:58:21.077558 run pcap-recorder_any(filters='host 10.42.42.2 and port not 22')(pid=25024): Terminated: ok {rc=0}
22:58:21.165712 bus                        /sierra_2: Setting Powered False
